Video Player is loading.
Commonwealth v Caetano, Massachusetts stun gun case oral arguments
neuhmz - 1,180 Views
0
0
Published on 18 Apr 2018 / In News and Politics
Holding: The explanation that the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts offered for upholding a state law prohibiting the possession of stun guns contradicts Supreme Court precedent in District of Columbia v. Heller and McDonald v. Chicago.
Judgment: Vacated and remanded in a per curiam opinion on March 21, 2016. Justice Alito filed a concurring opinion, in which Justice Thomas joined.
Show more
0 Comments
sort Sort by