Video Player is loading.
Commonwealth v Caetano, Massachusetts stun gun case oral arguments
neuhmz - 1,041 Vues
0
0
Holding: The explanation that the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts offered for upholding a state law prohibiting the possession of stun guns contradicts Supreme Court precedent in District of Columbia v. Heller and McDonald v. Chicago.
Judgment: Vacated and remanded in a per curiam opinion on March 21, 2016. Justice Alito filed a concurring opinion, in which Justice Thomas joined.
Montre plus
0 commentaires
sort Trier par