Video Player is loading.
Advertisement
Current Time 0:00
Duration -:-
Loaded: 0%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time -:-
1x

    Up next


    Same day Carlson picked on him, Matthew Liao was debating anti-natalism (hardcore eugenics) on YT

    SILVIEW Media
    SILVIEW Media - 285 Views
    55
    285 Views
    Published on 27 Jun 2021 / In

    More info: http://silview.media/2021/06/2....7/the-most-shocking-
    Abstract:
    Most people think that, other things being equal, you are at liberty to decide for yourself whether or not to have children. However, there are some people, aptly called anti-natalists, who believe that it is always morally wrong to have children. Anti-natalists are attracted to at least two types of arguments. According to the Positives Are Irrelevant Argument, unless a life contains no negative things at all, it is irrelevant that life also contains positive things. According to the Positives Are Insufficient Argument, while life does contain some positive things, as a matter of fact, almost everyone’s life contains more negative things than positive things. In this paper, I first offer new reasons to reject these arguments. I then offer a positive, human rights, account of why not only is it not wrong to bring people into existence, but parents in fact have a human right to do so.

    00:00 - Presentation
    29:33 - Q&A

    Show more
    0 Comments sort Sort by

    Up next