Pilots question the globe model

The way that lames think light shines on the Earth is another weak link. To think that light travels 93 million miles to become a bigot is retarded. Some places having a different season on Earth makes no sense if we revolve around a sphere of light as we rotate to expose the parts of the planet toward the direction where the light sphere is located. It doesn't matter if you spin a ball on an axis. If you spin it toward a light source, everything facing the light source will get the same light beamed at it. The only thing that prevents the light from being visible from the surface are obstacles. A light sphere works somewhat like a lantern, emitting light in all possible directions. The only difference is a sphere of light has no top or bottom. So, ambient (existing or present on all sides : ENCOMPASSING) light should always be visible within the radius of the distance that the light can emit. If we were that close to a light source what we call night would only appear as a shadow in day time. A shadow is not night time. It is light being obstructed. The part of a spinning ball that does not face the sphere of light should still have a visible lesser amount of light on the shadow side at all times, versus what we experience in reality with night. Our Sun works more like a flashlight instead of a light sphere. If the flashlight is moved out of perspective then we experience what we call night. Being impressed with the imaginary sum of 93 million miles is even more lame, when looking at the model on any scale. Regardless of what distance they say it is, being as close as they say should result in light always being visible in greater and lesser forms. The indoctrination they push would leave you to think if you are on Mars and Earth has the night side facing Mars, then Mars would receive no light, at least if looking from the night side of Earth, because it is totally dark from our actual perspective. Also, the fact that what we call stars (which are the ceiling) are only visible after the Sun goes out of perspective. One would think that we should be able to see more of the heavens when the Sun illuminates the sky, but reality works different from the theories of scientism. Their answer of the glare of refracted sunlight only applies to what they want it to apply to. According to 'them' light refracts and causes glare, but it's not ambient at this distance from the Sun. Glare and Refraction do occur in reality, just as it would if someone shined a flashlight in your eyes at night. It would temporarily blind you. If it were day time, then it wouldn't have the same effect, because of the greater light of the Sun that your eyes have already adjusted to. At night we experience the opposite of what we are told. If I shine a flashlight in your face and you try to see 'stars' while the light is in your face, you won't be able to perceive the 'stars'. If I shine the light at anything else your are able to see those things at night. If someone else has a flashlight you can see the beams of it's light and see the direction from where the light comes from. Night is only a matter of perspective and directional light that has a limited radius where it shines in a particular direction. Any shadow created while within the radius of that light source still has ambient light all around it, which is why we can tell day from night. We don't experience a shadow effect at night. At night it's lights out because our flashlight in the sky is not shinning on us.