ABSOLUTE PROOF-Mike Lindell

Ok? I understand the doubt you may have for Lindell and/or all the voter election/voter fraud claims. But, the problem I have is, not one court case that was dismissed was dismissed on ‘evidence’. They were dismissed on ‘standing’. If you do not know legal jargon, that is, in a nutshell, due to administrative, applicable, clerical, jurisdiction etc. issues. None of those dismissed cases even looked at, vetted or weighed any evidence. The case that did hear evidence is the Michigan case and because of the evidence, it is still active. There are 30+ cases still active as well as many legislatures pressing forward and following up with their in-state issues. The other issue I come across is people saying the information/evidence is misinformation, hogwash, has been debunked etc, yet they just say that but do not counter with legitimate proof. Even the recent videos that have popped up on YouTube trying to counter Lindell’s ‘Absolute Proof’, just seem like people putting their thumbs to the sides of their heads as they rotate their hands back and forth and saying, “Nanny, Nanny, Naaaaany!” in a teasing, bullying fashion, all-the-while laughing and giggling, yet they again…offer no line-by-line breakdown discussion of proof proving their claim tearing down the evidence in Lindell’s video. All of the supposed debunking disproving etc are more like ego-stroking sessions. Or, they are bizarre incidents were they get a public statement (not a signed affidavit) from someone involved who would or could suffer a legal consequence if the fraud claim comes out true, then apply full truth credibility to the statement. That is like pulling a drug raid, busting and cuffing the criminals on-scene, then asking them one question, “Did you do it?”, they say, “No, it is not what you think it is.” Then you take their word as some sort of Golden Gospel Truth, un-cuff them, wish them well and send them on their merry way all-the-while you tell all of the raid-team, “Oh well, we made a mistake, nothing to see here. All of this evidence we’ve been gathering before the raid must be wrong, so let’s just throw it away and all go home.” Listen, because all I want is truth and fairness, I am more than willing to listen and take the journey of a line-by-line, frame-by-frame factual (not opinion) debunking or factual (not opinion) disproving of the evidence brought forth in Lindell’s video. Let’s see it. If it is done by referencing a statement from someone, then show me they are not tied to the accused ring or if it is a referenced statement, show me the person who made the statement did so via a signed affidavit, which means they are willing to getprosecuted and incarcerate if they are lying! Because right now, there are thousands of signed affidavits from people having witnessed fraud.

@MaximPrecept: Great post. Furthermore, I think it's clear that we need a "block user" button on this site so we don't have to see garbage from trolls. :)