Up next


ZERO Evidence that COVID Fulfills Koch's 4 Germ Theory Postulates - Dr. Andrew Kaufman

Times of Truth
Times of Truth - 694 Views
206
694 Views
Published on 05 Oct 2020 / In People and Blogs

In this interview, Dr. Kaufman explores a new study published in NATURE which claims to establish COVID-19 related pathogenicity in an animal model, but which does not fulfill Koch's postulates for germ theory, and may overtly misrepresent the truth. This, in fact, is not new, as many publications have claimed to isolate COVID-19 or prove its role in causing animal and human deaths, yet none of them are actually capable of demonstrating this conclusively. Interviewer Sayer asks hard hitting questions and together they explore the implications of this and other research to the ongoing weaponization of germ theory as a political weapon for mass control and surveillance in violation of basic human, civil, constitutional and medical rights.

_____________

Further IMPORTANT Reading:-

Under the Freedom Act of Information in Canada it was asked to Heath Canada to provide a proof of pure-isolation of NOVEL-SARS-COV2 from the entire scientific world and the reply was they have NO SUCH RECORD.


Under the Freedom Act of Information there was the legal application question requested to Department of Health of various countries such as Canada, New Zealand , Australia and the United Kingdom ( and the reply from all the Health Departments from all the mentioned countries will shock you) : -


. . .FOI QUESTION . . . . .
It was asked for any or all records describing the pure-isolation of a SARS-COV-2 virus, directly from a
sample taken from a diseased patient, where the patient sample was not first combined with any other source of genetic material (i.e. monkey kidney cells
aka vero cells; liver cancer cells).

Please note that I am using "isolation" in the every-day sense of the word:
the act of separating a thing(s) from everything else. And carefully mind it I am not requesting records where "isolation of SARS-COV-2" refers instead to:

· the culturing of something, or
· the performance of an amplification test (i.e. a PCR test), or
· the sequencing of something.


Please also note that my request is not limited to records that were authored
by your department or that pertain to work done by your department. My request includes any
sort of record, for example (but not limited to) any published peer-reviewed
study that your department has downloaded or printed.
Please provide enough information about each record so that I may identify
and access each record with certainty (i.e. title, author(s), date, journal, where
the public may access it).”

. . . . .FOI QUESTION ENDS . . . . . . .


FYI - DO YOU EVEN KNOW :- that the establishment’s version of COVID-19 does not even pass the KOCH Postulates? ( yes readers have to research onto Koch Postulates )

Thus far (September 4, 2020) 8 Canadian institutions have provided their final response to this above legal FOI request: Health Canada, the National Research Council of Canada, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Organization-International Vaccine Centre (VIDO-InterVac), the University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, McMaster University, Mount Sinai Hospital (Toronto) and the Region of Peel (Ontario).
Every institution has indicated the same: that they searched and could locate no record describing the isolation of any “Novel-COVID-19 virus” directly from an unadulterated patient sample as per the FOI.


( And yes, the professionals who have put forth this FOI request are all aware of the many publications wherein authors claim to have “isolated the virus”. They’ve looked at numerous such studies and have yet to see one where they actually did so. Claiming to have done something and actually doing it are sometimes 2 different things, even in peer-reviewed science. ***[ 1 ] )



REPLY TO THE FOI QUESTION FROM HEALTH DEPARTMENTS

1. legal FOI reply by HEALTH CANADA, download link :
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.c....a/wp-content/uploads


2. Even Institutions in NEW ZEALAND, AUSTRALIA and ENGLAND also have no record of “novel-COVID-19 virus” isolation

A) Ministry of Health – NEW ZEALAND reply to the FOI:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.c....a/wp-content/uploads

B) AUSTRALIAN Government Department of Health reply to the FOI:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.c....a/wp-content/uploads

C) Even the UNITED KINGDOM Department of Health and Social care FOI reply :
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.c....a/wp-content/uploads

DO YOU EVEN KNOW most of the microbiologists, epidemiologists, immunologists have started raising and questioning the fraudulent covid-19 response of the establishment (mind it they all are having thousands of years of combined education and experience than what you and I may have) . But the mainstream media and establishment is not providing them any platform to speak up the TRUTH. Establishment and mainstream media is just pushing their propaganda narrative through their handpicked so called experts but fortunately science doesn’t not work with cherry picked paid experts, as science need vast counter thoughtful considerations to settle to any conclusions.

IMPORTANT:- Some of the professionals in the U.K. even wrote this letter to their Prime Minister challenging the PUBLIC HEALTH ENGLAND:- https://kevinpcorbett.com/onew....ebmedia/Signed%20Sta

….

I KNOW IT CAN BE SHOCKING TO OURMIND; “that how could our own governments can do this to us and even if they did do it they would surely tell us on Tv.” – that’s a fallacy but it is unfortunately the thinking of a large amount of people who are deeply drowned in establishment’s propaganda narrative.

If we really want the TRUTH then we all need to first empty each and every neurons of our brain cells to the accumulated scientifically crafted propaganda of the establishment. And come with the intention of finding the TRUTH with open mind and then only we shall find it.

___________________
***[ 1 ] Of course anyone can google and pull out pub-med or other published papers which are claiming to have ‘isolated’ novel-covid-19 but the professionals who filled these FOI’s are aware of these studies and not only that but rather all the Health Departments to which they have asked the FOI question are also aware of these studies; as all these Health Departments have to keep a recorded knowledge or always have access to these scientific papers.
And these Health Departments of the several countries did not counter the FOI scientific question asked with these google search feed results because these Health Departments know that they are in the realm of the ‘LEGAL Questioning’ and cannot just slap any first google search that claims that the virus has been isolated, because claiming and proof of have been done is two different things.

As many of the eager readers on the social media who are too much influenced by the establishment’s propaganda would instinctively try to do is and believe me I have seen them doing it in the comment boxes, i.e. jumping pre-maturely without fully reading the question, understanding the FOI question and without even reading the reply of the Health departments they just jump in with the reply link of the top searches in google to discredit any vital information as merely ‘ conspiracy theories’ – I don’t know what to call these people ?

Show more
0 Comments sort Sort by

Up next