Up next


WERE NASA APOLLO MOON LANDING MISSIONS FAKE

Renaud Be
Renaud Be - 1,071 Views
461
1,071 Views
Published on 14 May 2020 / In News and Politics

Alternative Video Links:
1. https://videos.utahgunexchange.....com/watch/GZyQHvZHI
2. https://www.joshwhotv.com/v/21748
3. https://drop.space/v/bgJEQL
4. https://www.nicovideo.jp/watch/sm37059860
5. https://archive.org/details/we....re-nasa-apollo-moon-
6. https://www.bitchute.com/video/5vIQ0cGimpBJ/
7. https://www.bitchute.com/video/eVnPuD8lgpm7/
8. https://www.bitchute.com/video/5inHeHkdxOWr/ (Blocked after 1000 views, still no responds from them)

Besides the original rockets blasting off into space with thousands of witnesses on the ground, the rest we only had to rely on, was very low quality camera images. Were the NASA Apollo moon landing missions just taxpayers money grabbing cheap studio production hoaxes, or was it real? The Apollo supposed moon landings were from 1969 to 1972, under the administrations of President Lyndon B. Johnson, a known KKK member, according to declassified JFK files, and he was also suspected of plotting the assassination of President Kennedy; As for President Richard Nixon, he was mixed up in that Watergate scandal and had to resign. Both were already mixed up in some pretty crooked shady deals, and a little moon hoax money grabbing, would not have been that much more of a stretch; And when these guys left, the Moon missions mysteriously ended and were never seen again, not even 48 years after, where the supposed technology would be more advanced and make things much easier, cheaper and faster, even to have a permanent base there, or on Mars.

NASA AND THE GREATEST LIE EVER TOLD:
1. https://videos.utahgunexchange.....com/watch/mEwfBHZyq
2. https://www.joshwhotv.com/v/20306
3. https://www.bitchute.com/video/8ccVxaAXDjj2/

#MoonLanding #ApolloMissions #MarsMission #NASA #FakeMoonLanding #NASAhoax #MoonLandingHoax #SpaceExploration #Moon #Mars #Jupiter #Saturn

Show more
2 Comments sort Sort by

Renaud Be
Renaud Be 4 months ago

COMMENTS FROM BITCHUTE
Sn SM: Four words.....Van Allen Radiation Belts...that's it and this is why we cannot go NOW
either.. In the period before the Apollo program this is well documented that you needed
TONS of shielding to get through the belts alive. This is why NASA now never lets any
manned flight above low earth orbit unless they are faked....

HvdH: one of several 20ieth-century-hoaxes filmed in the 20ieth-century-hoax-studios in hollywood-pedowood

RenaudBe: All waiting for Elon Musk to fake it to Mars in a tin can to grab more of US taxpayers' money
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/....images/181e07af446a3

frogchris998: fake fake fake fake

Bobzilla206: The High Desert is in East LA County like Palmdale and Lancaster. There is a NASA location nearby and a shit ton of aerospace industries like Lockheed, Rockwell, Northrup. Did the Astronaut give up their location comparing the soil of the moon to that of the High Desert?

robertron: A film maker argues that Apollo sequences couldn't have been hoaxed with 1960s video technology. He explains that the video technology of the time wouldn't allow for long slow motion sequences. He claims that this would have made a hoax impossible. It's an absurd assertion. I have very little experience with video production, but I know that this is false. It seems intentionally deceptive. The sequences could have easily been shot on high speed film and then either directly broadcast, or transferred to video tape using a telecine while rolling back at half speed. Telecine devices have been around since the early days of television. Early non-live television shows were often shot on film and transferred direct to broadcast video or recorded with telecine. I can't say that I'm 100% positive that Apollo was a hoax. However, it was technically possible to fake everything that was shown to the public. Parallel shadows could be created by using natural sunlight in an earthly studio or outdoors in a desert on Earth. Nvida did not "prove" anything with their albedo argument either. They only proved that the lunar albedo could account for well-lighted shadows. However, this doesn't "prove" that albedo was the light source. It's really just an answer to skeptics who say that artificial light would be necessary to light the shadows. It doesn't prove that artificial light wasn't used. The albedo of desert soils or sun reflectors on Earth could account for light in the shadows. Reflectors are often used for film/video shot in natural sunlight in order to light shadows. My concern is that people who entirely discount the possibility of a hoax are more easily duped by propaganda. They don't look at any mainstream narratives with a critical eye. Flat Earth Biblical literalists simply think that anything conspiratorial boils down to a millennia-old Satanic deception. It's clearly a mistake to associate flat Earth belief with Apollo skepticism. Flat Earth believers constitute an extremely small percentage of Apollo skeptics. That false association is being exploited by mainstream narratives as a way to discredit serious research into any plausible conspiracies.

Pullitlarry: Thank you for posting this video. Years ago I could type "Moon landing fake" in the you tube search and come up with this and many videos like it. Now if you try it on you tube all you will get is a bunch of fake moon landing debunking videos.

Reply   thumb_up 0   thumb_down 0
Show more

Up next