Video Player is loading.

Up next


Richard Gage: Twin Towers and Building 7: 9/11 New Evidence – Final Verdict Red Pill Expo Preview

Gee Gee Tee
Gee Gee Tee - 588 Views
2,847
588 Views
Published on 30 May 2021 / In News and Politics

Richard Gage, Founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, an expert on the collapse of the Twin Towers and Building 7: 9/11 New Evidence – Final Verdict

Because you know something is wrong.
Helping truth seekers understand how the world really works.

Mt. Rushmore / Rapid City, South Dakota, June 5-6
RED PILL EXPO https://redpillexpo.org/

Richard Gage: Twin Towers and Building 7: 9/11 New Evidence – Final Verdict Red Pill Expo Preview

Show more
2 Comments sort Sort by

Unreconstructed
Unreconstructed 3 years ago

This bald headed fucker is a liar. N.I.S.T never claimed regular office fires brought down building 7. N.I.S.T claimed that the extended fires were caused when the large diesel storage tanks ( 7 in all ) in building 7 ruptured. It was the diesel fuel that kept the fires in Building 7 burning long enough to soften the steel supports. The reason the building collapsed into itself was because the interior columns were the first to fail, pulling the outward supports inward. You don't have to melt steel for it to lose it's tensile strength and load bearing capabilities. What evidence is the their of explosions? Nothing was recorded on local seismographs between the aircraft striking each tower and the eventual collapse. Evidence of incendiaries? Please give me a break. When I was in the military I dealt with all sorts of explosives and incendiaries. Do you how long it would take and how labor intensive it would have been to rig that building for demo? Sometimes I think you people are too racist to admit a bunch of Arabs ( many who happened to be very competent structural engineers ) could have pulled this off. One more thing that the bald headed fucker fails to mention, one whole side of build seven had been ripped away when it was struck by hundreds of tons of debris that fell from hundreds of feet above Building 7. The conspiracy theorist are very careful not to show you that side of the building even though photographs exist and the extensive damage is clear for all to see.

Reply   thumb_up 0   thumb_down 0
Unreconstructed
Unreconstructed 3 years ago

nonsense

Reply   thumb_up 0   thumb_down 0
Tina C
Tina C 3 years ago

If you think 911 just happened, you're crazy. A building does not fall like that unless it's demo'd. Anyone with a brain could see that, WHEN it happened. The Ins claim on all buildings, that came down, went to one person. How could building 7 fall like a controlled demo, all the way down the street.

Reply   thumb_up 0   thumb_down 0
Unreconstructed
Unreconstructed 3 years ago

@Tina C: you are a bone head and fool. You believe this nonsense because it makes you feel special. I think i know a lot more about steel than you do. I worked as blacksmith. For steel to lose it's load bearing qualities all you have to do is heat it up enough for it to lose it's ability to lose it's tensile strength the was required to bare the load it was meant to bear. To put it simply if you have a steel beam that is meant to bare ten tons of load and you heat the steel to high enough temperature for an extended period of time you reduce the load baring capabilities of the steel.

Reply   thumb_up 0   thumb_down 0
Show more

Up next