Video Player is loading.

Up next


Race-Blind Criminal Law Is Officially Over

AmericanRenaissance
AmericanRenaissance - 1,248 Views
36
1,248 Views
Published on 19 Jun 2022 / In News and Politics

Jared Taylor explains an ominous State Supreme Court ruling that officially establishes whites as second-class citizens.

The transcript of this video is available here: https://www.amren.com/videos/2022/06/race-blind-criminal-law-is-officially-over/

Website: https://www.amren.com/
Gab: https://gab.ai/AmRenaissance
Telegram: https://t.me/amrenofficial
Conference Speeches: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/oXJDii58nHYl/
Podcast: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/PvE9Fgz40IbM/

Show more
4 Comments sort Sort by

Long Range Patrol
Long Range Patrol 1 year ago

The Europhobia infecting America will destroy it unless we fight back and make sure laws are applied uniformly.

Reply   thumb_up 0   thumb_down 0
Bear Cub
Bear Cub 2 years ago

One of the great evils over the last few years has been the horrible double-faced justice system. This is part of the ethic of the left: if it helps them it is good, if it helps America it is bad. They have completely gone over to the moral slippery slope of "ends justify the means" no matter the destruction it causes.

Reply   thumb_up 9   thumb_down 0
White Lives Matter 1776

Whites wrote the constitution, established this nation, and defended it with our blood. Those who are making us second class citizens are traitors.

Reply   thumb_up 12   thumb_down 0
Robert E. Lee
Robert E. Lee 2 years ago

AmRen really touches on many great issues that currently infect our justice system. If BIPOCs are to have lower standards than Whites, then they should not be allowed to live in the US. Here are some quotes from the transcript:

"Mr. Sum’s lawyers argued that although Mr. Sum was not seized, it was reasonable for him to think he was seized, because he is a person of color. It was reasonable for him to think he couldn’t just drive away, which he might have done if he were white, and therefore his lie to the officer must be treated as if it never happened. It was an unlawful seizure of information, and cannot be used as evidence.

All nine members of the Washington Supreme Court agreed. They stated flatly – without any evidence – that β€œimplicit, institutional, and unconscious biases, in addition to purposeful discrimination, have resulted in disproportionate police contacts, investigative seizures, and uses of force against Black, Indigenous, and other People of Color (BIPOC) in Washington.”

There is no evidence Mr. Sum ever got β€œthe talk.” There was no evidence he was ever mistreated by the police. In fact, Mr. Sum is Asian, which means people of his race are stopped, arrested, and convicted less often than whites. The judges said it didn’t matter. They wrote that Mr. Sum had no obligation to show that Asians are mistreated. The only thing that mattered was their assertion that BIPOCs are mistreated, and he was BIPOC. The judges didn’t even care what race the officer was. He could have been Asian. It didn’t matter. Nor did the judges care whether the officer even noticed Mr. Sum’s race. Mr. Sum was a BIPOC, and for that reason alone, he gets a break.

Think of where this could go. BIPOCs are more likely than whites to die at the hands of the police. Therefore, it’s not a sign of guilt if they run at the sight of a cop car. They are just getting out of pistol range. Likewise, it could be reasonable for BIPOCs to resist arrest, even kill an officer, out of legitimate fear that the police might kill them. This madness could go anywhere. For now, it’s law only Washington State.

Reply   thumb_up 13   thumb_down 0
Show more

Up next