Video Player is loading.

Up next


8 Comments sort Sort by

Betty
Betty 3 years ago

If its coming from the Left, it won't get investigated properly.... sadly... so much corruption.

Reply   thumb_up 0   thumb_down 0
MrBeepa
MrBeepa 3 years ago

Did Stroppy take a day off?

Reply   thumb_up 1   thumb_down 0
Ubetcha
Ubetcha 3 years ago

Keep on it. Great sources you share. I implore your audience to really check into the listed references. Wonderful to have a man like you Stroppy on board helping America. SALUTE!!

Reply   thumb_up 2   thumb_down 0
Thinker2
Thinker2 3 years ago

How many incidents of FRAUD are needed to reverse an election? Or is it only a matter of getting the Candidate or MSM to confess?
The evidence is enough to kill a medium size country and the debate continues... insanity
How do you get 1,125,940 more ballot returned than were sent out?
Why do only 1,000 people want to hear what the most popular man in history has to say?

Reply   thumb_up 2   thumb_down 0
Tom Noyb
Tom Noyb 3 years ago

Yes it appears criminal activity did occur, yet not a single criminal case has been brought? There are no US Attorney's in sight? That's why I said, "yet." Hard to argue criminal cases are a big part of the strategy until there are criminal cases on the horizon? DS's stalled and demurred every attempt to clean-up corruption thus far, so you'll forgive our skepticism that DS'll bring a criminal case in-time to effect this battle? In fact, it seems clear that if you don't win solely on civil-trial basis, one can be certain there will never be a criminal case? Same goes for military tribunals. Without a predicate, can there be tribunals? I'd cheer, but would the majority?

Four possibilities: 1) Civil, 2) Criminal, 3) National security, 4) Military tribunals. Of those, only Civil appears active?

The problem with raising the specter of criminality without criminal cases forthcoming is it shifts the burden-of-proof (in the public's mind). Instead of "preponderance," the court-of-public-opinion will now hold your team to the much higher "beyond-a-reasonable-doubt" standard? By raising the issue of criminality without criminal-cases in-progress, ongoing Civil procedures just became that much more difficult?

Reply   thumb_up 2   thumb_down 0
Tom Noyb
Tom Noyb 3 years ago

Please don't misconstrue the above to imply criminality should be ignored or dropped. Rather, that criminal assertions will not be accepted, they must be proven. Maria asked the right question; you knew cheating was coming, where are the video-tapes of trucks bringing-in fraudulent ballots? You had satellite NRO capability at your fingertips - where is it? Long-rumored ballot-marking might help, but video is better. Gateway Pundit couldn't be bothered to insert arrows to show the fraud? Voters expect video-proof in a case like this, not expert-testimony. What judge is going to throw-out even one good-ballot, even if there are a million proven fraud-ballots with it?

Reply   thumb_up 0   thumb_down 0
Show more

Up next