Video Player is loading.

Up next


4.9.21 Patriot Streetfighter LIVESTREAM_ Using Common Law The Deep Courts Will Be Defeated.mp4

Kidd and Ostara Schultz
Kidd and Ostara Schultz - 1,858 Views
281
1,858 Views
Published on 10 Apr 2021 / In News and Politics

Show more
5 Comments sort Sort by

snoop4truth
snoop4truth 4 years ago

COMMON LAW COUNTRIES ARE THE DARK PINK-COLORED COUNTRIES HERE. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/....Common_law#/media/Fi ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ SEE THE DEFINITION OF THE COMMON LAW IN ALL OF THESE LAW DICTIONARIES HERE. https://www.goldismoney2.com/t....hreads/the-confusion ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... HOW THE COMMON LAW WAS MISUNDERSTOOD. The "common law" is merely "case law written by judges". It was once also called "unwritten law" SOLELY BECAUSE IT WAS NOT WRITTEN BY ELECTED POLITICIANS AND NOT PUBLISHED IN STATUTE BOOKS. BUT, THIS DOES NOT MEAN THAT THE COMMON LAW WAS UNWRITTEN AND UNPUBLISHED ALTOGETHER. IT WAS (AND IT STILL IS). Common law was and still is written by appellate judges and is still published in "Court Reporters" (not statute or code books). But, amateur legal theorists do not know this. They mistakenly believe that the common law WAS NEVER WRITTEN IN THE FIRST PLACE and that it has been replaced by modern written law. But, this is not so. COMMON LAW IS WRITTEN LAW and is still the single most commonly used form of law in the United States and many other countries that were once part of the English Empire, including Australia and New Zealand. ALL OF THE COURTS IN ALL OF THESE COUNTRIES ARE COMMON LAW COURTS AND ALL OF THEM STILL MAKE, STILL USE AND STILL FOLLOW THE COMMON LAW. Common law is still being made (written and published) every single day all over the globe. FOR PROOF, CLICK HERE. https://www.goldismoney2.com/t....hreads/the-confusion. ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................
ABOUT THE SOVEREIGN AND SOVEREIGNTY: Under United States law, WE (a PLURAL term) the PEOPLE (also a PLURAL term) COMBINED, COLLECTIVELY, AS A WHOLE, AS A SINGLE BODY are "sovereign". But, under United States law, NO SINGLE INDIVIDUAL, BY HIMSELF, ALONE is "sovereign". So, there is a CRITICAL legal difference between "ALL OF US" on one hand and "ONE OF US" on the other hand. One is sovereign and the other is not. For the actual law on this subject, CLICK HERE. https://www.goldismoney2.com/t....hreads/the-confusion

THE LEGAL SYSTEM OF THE UNITED STATES IS DESIGNED SO THAT EVERY PERSON INVOLVED IS ACTUALLY PLACED INTO OFFICE (DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY) BY "WE THE PEOPLE" THROUGH THE ELECTION PROCESS (AND NOT PLACED INTO OFFICE BY THE GOVERNMENT).. ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... IN THE STATE COURT SYSTEM, "WE THE PEOPLE" ACTUALLY ELECT ALL OF OUR OWN LAWMAKERS (WHO ACTUALLY WRITE ALL OF OUR OWN STATE STATUTES). "WE THE PEOPLE" ACTUALLY ELECT ALL OF OUR OWN LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY HEADS, INCLUDING ALL OF OUR OWN CITY POLICE CHIEFS, ALL OF OWN COUNTY SHERIFFS & ALL OF OUR OWN STATE GOVERNORS (ALL OF WHOM ACTUALLY DETERMINE ALL OF OUR OWN STATE LAW ENFORCEMENT POLICIES AND WHO ACTUALLY EMPLOY AND CONTROL ALL OF OUR OWN STATE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS). "WE THE PEOPLE" ACTUALLY ELECT ALL OF OUR OWN STATE TRIAL COURT JUDGES (WHO ENSURE THE RULES OF PROCEDURE AND EVIDENCE ARE FOLLOWED AND WHO APPLY OUR OWN STATE STATUTES WRITTEN BY OUR OWN ELECTED LAW MAKERS AND WHO ALSO APPLY THE STATE CASE LAW WRITTEN BY OUR OWN ELECTED HIGHER STATE COURTS. "WE THE PEOPLE" ACTUALLY ELECT (OR ELECT TO RETAIN) ALL OF OUR OWN STATE APPELLATE COURT JUDGES AND ALL OF OUR OWN STATE SUPREME COURT JUSTICES (WHO ACTUALLY WRITE ALL OF OUR OWN STATE CASE LAW). :"WE THE PEOPLE" ALSO ACTUALLY ELECT ALL OF OUR OWN STATE PUBLIC DEFENDERS. FINALLY, IN SOME STATES, "WE THE PEOPLE" EVEN ELECT ALL OF OUR OWN STATE PROSECUTORS (STATE'S ATTORNEYS). '....................................................................................................................................................................................................... THE FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM IS DESIGNED IN THE SAME WAY EXCEPT THAT OUR FEDERAL JUDGES, OUR FEDERAL PROSECUTORS AND OUR FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDERS ARE APPOINTED BY THOSE WHO WE ELECT TO MAKE THOSE APPOINTMENTS FOR US (THE PRESIDENT & THE SENATE). OBVIOUSLY, WE STILL ELECT THE MEMBERS OF OUR OWN CONGRESS (OUR OWN ELECTED FEDERAL LAWMAKERS) AND WE STILL ELECT OUR OWN PRESIDENT (OUR OWN ELECTED FEDERAL CHIEF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER). ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... IN BOTH THE STATE AND FEDERAL LEGAL SYSTEM, THE PARTIES TO EACH CRIMINAL CASE, THEMSELVES, EVEN GET TO PICK (EFFECTIVELY "ELECT") THEIR OWN JURIES (WHO DECIDE THE ULTIMATE QUESTION OF GUILT OR INNOCENCE IN THE CASE). IN BOTH THE STATE AND THE FEDERAL LEGAL SYSTEM, NO JUDGE IS ALLOWED TO DECIDE THE ULTIMATE QUESTION OF GUILT OR INNOCENCE IN A CRIMINAL CASE.. ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... THIS IS HOW "WE THE PEOPLE" USE THE ELECTION PROCESS TO CONTROL OUR OWN STATE AND FEDERAL LEGAL SYSTEM. FOR PROOF THAT "WE THE PEOPLE" CONTROL OUR OWN STATE AND FEDERAL LEGAL SYSTEM, CLICK HERE (INCLUDES THE DEFINITION OF THE "STATE", THE "SOVEREIGN" , "SOVEREIGNTY", "CONSENT" OF THE GOVERNED AND THE "GOVERNED")... https://www.goldismoney2.com/t....hreads/how-the-legal

THE BACKGROUND AND HISTORIES OF THESE FAKE LEGAL EXPERTS IS AS FAKE AS THEIR CLAIMS ABOUT THE LAW

Rodney DALE Class pretended to be "Judge DALE (retired)" when writing FAKE legal books which revealed FAKE legal information about a FAKE legal system which does not actually exist. Class currently claims to be a "private attorney general" (which, unknown to Class, actually means the "civil rights" client of an attorney in federal court). Class also pretends to be a "14th amendment, section 4 bounty hunter" (which, unknown to Class, actually means a Civil War soldier who enlisted in the Union Army to collect an enlistment bonus, then called a "bounty") . Class even wears a fraudulently-marked costume and drives a fraudulently-marked vehicle fraudulently indicating that he is both. In reality, Class is a multi-convicted, weapons-related felon who is on the U.S. terrorist watch list who has a long history of mental illness for which he has been repeatedly and involuntarily incarcerated in mental institutions. Class has lost every single case in which he has ever purported to represent himself or others, all 80 consecutive cases in a row. http://projectavalon.net/forum....4/showthread.php?994



Anthony Troy Williams claims to be a "private attorney general (which, unknown to Williams, actually means the "civil rights" client of an attorney in federal court). Williams also claims to be a "sovereign peace officer" (something which does not exist). Williams actually carries a fake badge, a fake ID and wears a fake lanyard around his neck fraudulently indicating such (effectively a law enforcement "costume"). In reality, Williams is a career criminal and multi-convicted felon who has lost 90 plus cases in a row and who will spend the rest of his life behind bars for charging customers thousands of dollars each for a FAKE foreclosure rescue scheme which did not actually work. https://www.waccobb.net/forums..../showthread.php?1328



Debra Jones claims to be a "former policewoman", "former attorney", a medical "doctor" and even claimed that she was "groomed" by the "Police Benevolent Association" to be "PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES". In reality, Jones was never any of these things. She has NEVER has a professional license of any type. So, she could not possibly be a former attorney. Jones has made a small fortune marketing seminars wherein she pretended to be a "legal insider" who confessed to diabolical (and imaginary) corruption inside the legal system, all while pretending to be a former police officer and a former attorney. https://www.waccobb.net/forums..../showthread.php?1323



Judge Anna Von Reitz (real name Anna Maria Reizinger) claims to be a "judge". But this is not so. She is an anti-government protester who creates all-new, imaginary reasons for hating the government, all of which are utterly delusional. Von Reitz still creates and issues imaginary court decrees and imaginary court orders in her imaginary capacity as a make-believe "judge". https://www.splcenter.org/hate....watch/2017/12/15/int



Eddie Craig claims to be a "former deputy sheriff" and an expert in traffic law. But this is not so. The closest that Eddie Craig ever came to being a "former sheriff deputy" was for a period of two weeks in 1992 when he was a "PART TIME" "JAILER" in Nacogdoches County, Texas at which time, he was unceremoniously FIRED, "NOT ELIGIBLE FOR RE-HIRE". Eddie Craig tells his audience that he is an expert on traffic law based on the knowledge he gained during this two week "career in law enforcement" during which he never so much as sat behind the wheel of a patrol vehicle, much less made a single traffic stop. Eddie Craig has also lost every case in which he has ever been involved, including all five of his own cases, one of which was his own criminal misdemeanor speeding case. http://projectavalon.net/forum....4/showthread.php?995



Carl Miller (real name "Richard Champion") claims to be a "Constitutional Scholar" with a "92% winning record in court". But, this is not so. Miller is actually a multi-convicted, weapons-related career felon who has lost every single case in which he ever represented himself in court, 26 consecutive losses in a row. Miller was deemed unfit for military service and discharged from the military and has been institutionalized TWICE in mental hospitals in Michigan, once as a 14 year old child and once as an adult. https://www.waccobb.net/forums..../showthread.php?1316



Ron Gibson claims to be a book author, "counselor at law" (something illegal for him to claim) who is becoming a "private attorney general" (which, unknown to Gibson, actually means the "civil rights" CLIENT of an attorney in federal court), an expert in land patents and allodial title and he falsely claims to have studied "Constitutional Law" in college. (Constitutional Law is only taught in Law School and not in college.). None of the forgoing claims are true except that Gibson has organized and written some legally erroneous material on land patents and allodial title which he refers to as his "book". https://www.goldismoney2.com/t....hreads/the-ron-gibso Click here and scroll down to the bottom of the page. https://josephfarleyshow.com/2....019/02/21/what-you-n

David Lester Straight claims to be a "former [CIA] intelligence officer", a "former deputy sheriff", a "retired secret service agent" and that he "has been helping people win in court for 30 years", that he "has recently served on two Presidential Task Forces", that he "HAS RESCUED OVER 250 CHILDREN FROM CPS" and that he has "CREATED PAPERWORK WHICH RESULTED IN OVER 800 VICTORIES IN COURT" and that he "HAS HELPED TRIBAL NATIONS RECOVER LAND AND SOVEREIGNTY" and that he "HAS HELPED PEOPLE GET OUT OF PRISON AND PREVENTED PEOPLE FROM GOING TO PRISON" and that he" "HAS HELPED PEOPLE PERFECT LAND PATENTS" and that he "WAS A MEMBER OF THE BUNDY DEFENSE TEAM", that "using his [homemade] form AFFIDAVIT to RENOUNCE YOUR U.S. CITIZENSHIP while still residing on U.S. soil will render you exempt from U.S. law, INCLUDING U.S. INCOME TAX LAW", and that he "HAS SUCCESSFULLY RENDERED PRIVATELY-OWNED LAND EXEMPT FROM GOVERNMENTAL REGULATION, FORECLOSURE LAWS AND PROPERTY TAX OBLIGATION BY USE OF A LAND PATENT" which unknown to David Lester Straight. does not convey "allodial title" to private persons or entities. https://www.goldismoney2.com/t....hreads/the-david-les

Reply   thumb_up 0   thumb_down 0
Edward Jay Robin Paraclete

It seems that Chris is only just now waking up to what the Bible has been saying for 1600 years Seuteronomy 1:17. 10:17, 2nd Samuel 13:14,Matthew 22:16, Acts 10:34, Romans 2:11 and James 2:9 cautioning us and warning to not affilate with dead persons.. I have been teaching this for over 20 years andhave the knowledge proven that common law is not the end all solution you think...Faith exercized is the ultimate power mankind has bu the false Romans 13 mindset taught from the pul[pit for 16 centuries has warped the mind so rather than resisting we bow and consent fiollowing the falseinterpretation of Romans 13... here is some proof of how this works.. https://youtu.be/p49bGkNgOi4... We are Stewards over the property of our creator.

Reply   thumb_up 0   thumb_down 0
Edward Jay Robin Paraclete

there is nothing civil about a court that assumes your benefically owned property....Chris has an exremely foul mouth an negative energy reliant upon the Common law instead of God's law that walks all over common law pointing to ICCPR as the watchman so as to not make use of the ICCPR but so as to have proof of their awareness of it binding application supported by article 27 of the Vienna convention so as to eliminate secular argument....Resorting to common law without mentioning the fraud of usurping God's law with the man made scam of common law reverts man to be controlled by the whem of other men ignoring bypassing and overwriting God's law with their xcorrupted decisions...Chris just hated being upstaged by the Bible and spewed vitroil and venom when I tried to educate him as to his error....Such an ego bound godless man offers no benefit to those still subjected to a religious fraud slave camp....

Reply   thumb_up 0   thumb_down 0
Edward Jay Robin Paraclete

by theway I can indeed prove this is a religious fraud slave camp being run by those following Talmud qwhich cuts to the core of the problem..Chris intentionally avoids that fact and reality because he has no knowledge of it and the info defeats his ego builder experience with common law...

Reply   thumb_up 0   thumb_down 0
Edward Jay Robin Paraclete

https://youtu.be/dxtn1iN5xfQ is an essential compenant of coming out of the fraud bpreached from the pulpit for 16 centuries...Once exposed as a false interpretation we are totally directed to resist and not submit to the graveyard world of corporate government ruling the dead and beneficially owned property as indicated in the Canadian Ownership Control and Determination Act bonding life value at 8 million at birth and the 1984 regulations in line with the Deleware Corporations Act Title 8 wherein 10 million is the value of a life therein indicated...The Cestui Que Trust indeed exists under land Titles asseen here.. https://www.servicealberta.ca/....pdf/ltmanual/LIF-1.p and the transfer of such asset here https://www.servicealberta.ca/....pdf/ltmanual/FORM8.p and here https://www.canlii.org/en/ab/l....aws/stat/rsa-2000-c- or the US version https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/3/3-419 Reading Leviticus 25:44-50 will explain wht the Rabbi's I went to told me all the goyim of the world got purchased at birth as of the debt of the corporations those children got re gistered into as collatorol and surety to form securities for trading.. This is indeed a Leviticus 25 slave camp perpetual being run by God's chosen people he divorced for adultery!!! They murdered his Son so they could continue their free labour fraud...Christ was sent to free us from the slave camp fraud and gave his blood to redeem us!!

Reply   thumb_up 0   thumb_down 0
Edward Jay Robin Paraclete

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmoAvTPebf0 may also offer insite as before common law there was the law of the land..the ten commandments..Magna Carta was a bait and switch effort by the Barons and King John to eliminate the threat the ten commandments presented when the common folks went to court...The blue blood law was still the Bible but the commoners got common law for those so common as to offend the royal bloodline... The ICCPR is the most recogbised law at this time in the world as having duty to accommodate attached to every service provider who is sugnatory to it..Binding and OIbligatory and as such veryfew even know of it and the superiority of law is possesses...Commonlaw has many pitfalls associated with it and corrupted judiciary interferring...The ICCPR operates upon a demand for accommodation that makes it criminal when the service provider fails..It is called nuisance or attempting to intimidate you to submit to color of law.. Title 18 ss 241,242 ,245 and 247 in the USA and sections 126 176 189 336 and 465 of the criminal code in Canada are breached when a demand for accommodation is received and ignored..172 countries have ratified the ICCPR as the worlds top law repecting freedoms of mankind...Article 3 of that covenant offers the ability to waive article 16 temptation to submit to the dead personage so as to secure your article 18 freedom. The total death stats are the evidence the plague is a fraud as no countries have marked in increase in deaths and many are even less than previous years...Those stats are the smoking gun of facts to prove we are being defrauded of our freedoms..

Reply   thumb_up 0   thumb_down 0
Show more

Up next